Carbon credits play a critical role in global efforts to combat climate change, offering a market-based approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, the price of carbon credits in the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM) varies significantly based on multiple factors. Understanding these factors is essential for businesses and investors to make informed decisions when buying or selling carbon credits. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the following key factors that influence the price of carbon credits.
Checklist: Fundamentals in Carbon Credit Pricing
In the VCM, the price isn't set by a centralized entity - it's up to the participant (project developer, broker, organization, marketplace etc.) to set their own pricing based on operational costs, market demands and their self-assessed value of their credits.
Multiple factors will impact how you should value each carbon credit - but as a rule of thumb, a high price doesn't automatically make the carbon credit of high quality, but a low listing price certainly indicates that it most likely is of lower quality.
Finding a good deal in the VCM isn't always about finding the cheapest option - due to the fluctuation in quality, aim to spot what makes a carbon credit good and take advantage of what you believe is a bargain.
How Supply and Demand Influence Carbon Credit Prices
The fundamental economic principle of supply and demand significantly impacts the price of carbon credits. Like any commodity, the balance between the availability (supply) of carbon credits and the desire to purchase them (demand) determines market prices.
Supply Factors
Technological Barriers
Although multiple worldwide solutions are emerging, a supply shortage can be caused by technological barriers; or to be more precise, a lack of technological advancements. As most transactions are occurring over the counter (OTC), it excludes a large buyer pool in certain markets; affecting supply.
Availability of Carbon Credit Projects
The number of registered carbon credit projects directly affects supply. More projects result in greater supply, potentially lowering prices. It's important to not group all carbon credits together while measuring the total supply; there's a big difference in the supply for low-quality credits, and, for credits of higher quality.
Conversely, limited project availability or delays in project verification can constrain supply, driving prices up. This usually only happens for the high-end credits, as there's a great amount of unsold cheap carbon credits in existence. (And they are unsold for a reason).
Geographical Distribution
Projects in regions with favorable regulatory environments or abundant natural resources (e.g., reforestation in tropical countries) often have a higher supply.
Contradictory to this however, although the overall supply is high is that depending on the quality of the carbon credit, it may be more valuable. In crucial areas where additional benefits can be achieved (more on this later), there's a possibility to value the credits at a premium despite a high supply.
Demand Factors
Corporate Net Zero Targets
Increasing corporate commitments to net zero emissions are driving demand for carbon credits, particularly in industries with hard-to-abate emissions (e.g., aviation, manufacturing).
This growing demand often leads to price surges, especially for high-quality verified credits. More and more companies realize the importance of slowing down climate change, meanwhile those who already are offsetting their emissions are setting even higher goals.
Government Regulations
Compliance markets require companies to purchase carbon credits to meet regulatory emission caps, influencing demand and price levels.
Although it's important to distinct the difference between carbon allowances and voluntary carbon credits, a changing regulatory landscape may inflict greater interest in the VCM; driving the demand higher.
Real-life Events
As our climate gets warmer and warmer, we start to experience the negative effects. When more people gets affected, or even threatened, by the negative outcomes of climate change, it may serve as a call to action - thus driving the demand for climate-friendly investments.
Seasonal and Economic Trends
Seasonal demand fluctuations, such as year-end carbon offset purchases for corporate reporting, can influence prices.
Economic downturns may reduce demand, leading to price declines. We predict that the effect of economic downturns will be less and less however, as the need for carbon offsetting matures into an essential centerpiece for any corporate, despite current market situations.
Project Category
Different categories of carbon projects comes with their own strengths and weaknesses; which in turn, will impact their pricing. We will go through the most common ones.
Nature-based Solutions
Characteristics and Price Range:
Typically lower-priced compared to tech-based solutions due to simpler implementation and lower costs.
Examples: Afforestation, reforestation, and soil carbon sequestration.
Price Range: Generally between $0.2 to $15 per ton of CO2e.
Challenges and Considerations:
Prone to risks of impermanence (e.g., forest fires, deforestation).
Issues related to leakage (e.g., emissions displaced to another area).
Benefits and Strenghts:
Cheap and easy to scale.
May have a great impact on the surrounding communities (adhering to the UNSDG'S)
Tech-based Solutions
Characteristics and Price Range:
Significantly higher prices due to complex engineering, high capital costs, and cutting-edge technology.
Examples:
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): Captures emissions from industrial sources and stores them underground.
Direct Air Capture (DAC): Extracts CO2 directly from the atmosphere.
Price Range: Ranges from $50 to $600 per ton of CO2e, depending on technology maturity and scale.
Why Tech-based Solutions Are More Expensive:
High research and development costs.
Expensive operational and maintenance requirements.
Limited supply due to the early stage of technology deployment.
Market Trends:
Increasing demand from companies seeking high-quality, permanent carbon removals.
Potential for price reduction as technologies scale and become more efficient.
Quality and Verification Standards
Carbon credits with high scores in terms of additionality, permanence, and leakage prevention command higher prices due to their high environmental integrity and credibility.
Additionality:
Ensures that the emission reduction would not have occurred without the carbon credit project.
High additionality is crucial for credibility and higher pricing.
Permanence:
Refers to the long-term storage or reduction of carbon emissions.
Projects with guaranteed permanence (e.g., CCS) are priced higher than those with risks of reversal (e.g., forestry).
Robust MRV Standards
MRV (Measurement, Reporting, and Verification):
Projects with stringent MRV protocols are more reliable and transparent, attracting premium pricing.
Leading standards include:
Verra (VCS) – High environmental integrity and credibility.
Gold Standard – Ensures social and environmental benefits beyond carbon.
Planetary Carbon Standard - The most robust standard for MRV, and also the most user friendly.
Co-benefits
Carbon credits certified with additional environmental and social co-benefits, such as biodiversity conservation or community development, attract significant price premiums.
The more goals achieved according to the UNSDG'S, the more attractive the credit will be for speculators. And the other way around, the less UNSDG's achieved, the less attractive it will be. This typically has a greater impact on nature based credits; as tech-based credits usually has a lesser impact overall through additional benefits.
Vintage
Vintage refers to the year in which a carbon credit was issued, representing the year the emission reduction or removal took place. Generally speaking, more recently produced credits will attract a premium price.
This is partly due to the uncertainty of the quality of older credits. They may have used faulty and/or outdated verification methods, or lacked a proper registry for traceability; opening up for double-counting and fraud.
Newer credits however, has a higher probability of adhering to better scientific standards, while also utilizing new technology for even better credibility. The market outlook for newer credits looks bright, as more and more corporate investors value credibility to prevent negative outcomes.
Comments